Showing posts with label cannabis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cannabis. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Expert Opinion Paper - National MS Society Makes Recommendations Regarding Therapeutic Use Of Cannabis





Washington, DC: Cannabis has the potential to treat symptoms of multiple sclerosis as well as limit the progression of the disease, according to an expert opinion paper published by the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society. However, the Society stopped short of recommending that MS patients use the drug medicinally.

“Although it is clear that cannabinoids have potential both for the management of MS symptoms such as pain and spasticity, as well as for neuroprotection, the Society cannot at this time recommend that medical marijuana be made widely available to people with MS for symptom management,” the Society concludes. “This situation might change, should better data become available that clearly demonstrate benefit.”

The Society recommends that future clinical trials focus on methods of cannabinoid administration that deliver the drug to the bloodstream rapidly, such as vaporization.

The Society also recommends clinical trials be performed to investigate and quantify cannabis’ potential to slow disease progression, citing “anecdotal reports from patients … that cannabis reduces the frequency of their MS attacks.”

Investigators at Plymouth’s Peninsula Medical School in Britain recently announced that they had recruited nearly 500 MS patients for a three-year clinical trial assessing whether the use of oral THC can significantly slow the onset of multiple sclerosis.

Clinical data reported in 2006 from an extended open-label study of 167 multiple sclerosis patients found that the use of whole plant cannabinoid extracts relieved symptoms of pain, spasticity, and bladder incontinence for an extended period of treatment (mean duration of study participants was 434 days) without requiring subjects to increase their dose.

Results from a separate two-year open label extension trial in 2007 also reported that the administration of cannabis extracts was associated with long-term reductions in neuropathic pain in select MS patients. On average, patients in the study required fewer daily doses of the drug and reported lower median pain scores the longer they took it.

Commenting on the MS Society report, NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano said: “The MS Society’s recommendations are a positive step, but they don’t go far enough. Surveys indicate that as many as one out of two MS patients use cannabis therapeutically, yet this report does nothing to challenge these patients legal status as criminals.”



For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director, at: paul@norml.orgThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Full text of the MS Society paper, “Recommendations Regarding the Use of Cannabis in Multiple Sclerosis”. Additional information on cannabinoids and multiple sclerosis is available from NORML. The paper can also be downloaded from the NMSS web site in PDF format by clicking on the title of this posting.

http://norml.org/

Monday, July 23, 2007

MHRA stalls cannabis-based MS drug





By Anna Lewcock

23/07/2007 - A UK firm developing cannabis-derived multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments has decided to pull an EU application for its lead candidate Sativex, following demands by UK regulators for additional data in support of the treatment.

Despite the fact that there are no quality or safety issues standing in the way of approval for GW Pharmaceuticals' MS spasticity treatment Sativex, and clinical efficacy data showing promising and statistically significant results, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has requested an 'enriched design' study be carried out focussing on specific patients who respond to the treatment.

MS specialist Professor Mike Barnes of the University of Newcastle criticised the regulator's "bureaucratic approach," claiming it is "regrettable and unnecessary…that the regulators require GW to generate further data to show what we already know - that Sativex is a safe and efficacious treatment for people with MS."

The stumbling block in the approval process has been caused by the fact that Sativex is intended for patients who have exhausted all other treatment options, which means that some subjects simply lack the ability to respond to the the drug, or any other MS treatment.

"That translates in a clinical trial setting into a situation where…patients who do respond [are] masked by the lack of response in those patients who simply don't have the capacity to respond," explained Stephen Wright, R&D director at GW.

As such, the MHRA has asked GW to carry out confirmatory studies looking only at patients showing a response to Sativex, and to identify the level in response in this set of subjects. Although the company carried out analysis of existing data through which responders were found to be easily identifiable, as well as 62 per cent more likely to achieve a meaningful response than on placebo, the MHRA has put its foot down and demanded more data be generated before the drug can be approved.

"Analyses show we can very reliably identify responders after four weeks of treatment," said Wright.

"From the regulator's point of view that is very encouraging, but from a technical point of view they have a requirement that those analyses be carried out in a prospective way rather than in a 'post-hoc' analysis."

GW had planned to carry this type of study further down the line anyway, and as such is already well-prepared to carry out the confirmatory study. The first patients should be able to enter the trial in October this year, with completion expected in around 12 months time.

The company has two options for resubmission in the EU following the decision to withdraw its application last week. A second pivotal Phase III trial of Sativex for the treatment of MS neuropathic pain is due to complete in early 2008, which could lead to a regulatory filing around that time. As the outstanding issue regarding efficacy in responders relates to an indication of MS spasticity, it should not affect the pain application.

Should GW not submit an application for the neuropathic pain indication, the company's next opportunity is to submit for MS spasticity in the second half of 2008 following completion of the additional study.

"It's quite clear from our discussions with [the MHRA] that this enrichment study, providing it's positive, will result in the approval of Sativex," said Wright.

Sativex is GW Pharmaceutical's first product, and is being developed for approval in four target indications: MS spasticity, MS neuropathic pain, cancer pain and peripheral neuropathic pain.

The treatment is based on extracts taken from the widely-used recreational drug cannabis, and applied as an oro-mucosal spray to the mouth. It is based on a combination of two well-characterised cannabinoids (chemical compounds found only in the cannabis plant), delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD).

THC has been shown to have analgesic, anti-spasmodic, anti-tremor, anti-inflammatory, appetite stimulant and anti-emetic properties, while CBD has shown anti-inflammatory, anti-convulsant, anti-psychotic, anti-oxidant, neuroprotective and immunomodulatory effects.

In April 2005 GW received approval for Sativex in Canada, for use as an adjunctive therapy for the relief of neuropathic pain in patients with MS. The company also expects Canadian approval for the relief of cancer pain in the near future.

In the US, cancer pain is the lead indication for Sativex, with the first patients entering pivotal late stage trials next month.

While the drug is yet to be approved anywhere outside Canada, the company has already licensed Sativex to Bayer Healthcare for the Canadian and UK markets and Almirall Prodesfarma for the rest of Europe, as well as Otsuka for the US market. Together, these agreements have generated $51m (€37m) in signature fees, up to $376m in milestone payments, and 'significant' long term supply price provisions.